DOJ releases unedited Barr memo detailing decision not to indict Trump in Russia probe

The nine-page memo was released Wednesday as part of a lawsuit over public records related to Mueller’s investigation. federal court ordered The Department of Justice will release the full document.

“It would be unusual for federal prosecutors to bring obstruction charges that did not arise from proceedings related to another crime,” then-Senior Justice Department officials Stephen Engel and Ed O’Callaghan wrote in a document, which It concludes with: A formal recommendation against the indictment of Trump signed and endorsed by Barr on March 24, 2019.

it’s the same date Barr notified Congress His decision not to indict Trump was later criticized by Mueller and legal analysts saying: cherry picking From Mueller’s report.
This memo contains the legal analysis presented on Barr. His two federal courts involved in public records cases concluded Mr. Barr: Didn’t actually rely on notes Seeking legal advice, he never seriously considered prosecuting Trump and had already made up his mind before he asked for the memo, signing the memo after informing Congress of his decision.
Last week, a federal appeals court ruled that the memo should be made public in its entirety, and the memo is meant to enhance public disclosure of Burr’s controversial decision to prosecute Trump as part of an “academic exercise.” ” or “thought experiments”. lawsuit Brought about by the responsibility and ethics of the citizens of Washington, a government oversight body.

How Burr parted ways with Muller

In a memo, Barr’s representatives criticized Mueller’s analysis of related sabotage cases and said Trump should not be prosecuted.

In a memo, Barr’s aide claimed that “all of the successful sabotage cases referred to in the (Mueller) report were committed to prevent investigation and prosecution of separate crimes.” The existence of such a crime is not a necessary factor to establish a crime of obstruction, but the lack of underlying guilt is relevant and strong evidence.”

Muller concluded that there were several incidents Strong Evidence of Sabotage by trump. Barr’s representatives, however, argued that Trump “tried to change the process as the special counsel investigation progressed,” but did not “deliberately change the evidence.”
Specifically, Barr’s representatives concluded that Trump did not break the law in any of the cases Mueller highlighted. This includes Trump’s dismissal of his FBI Director James Comey and his earlier dismissal. Request to Comey To ease the criminal investigation of his former chief adviser, Michael Flynn.

“The president’s statement of ‘hope’ that Comey would ‘let this go’ did not explicitly prescribe any particular course of action in the Flynn investigation, and Comey at the time appeared as if he had received direct orders from the president. Did not respond, the lawmaker wrote in an internal memo.

Barr’s aide gave some credence to the idea that Trump may have been sabotaging by telling Don McGurn, White House Advisor, to write a note that they never tried to fire Mueller. Barr’s aide acknowledged that Trump likely knew this wasn’t true, but said, “Beyond reasonable doubt that the president tried to trick McGahn into lying. There is insufficient evidence to conclude.”
The release of the unredacted memo comes at a time when the Justice Department is investigating Trump again for possible obstruction of justice — this time in connection with a criminal investigation. whether he mishandled classified documents What he took from the White House to Mar-a-Lago.

This story has been updated with additional details.

CNN’s Caitlin Polanz, Evan Perez, Hannah Rabinowitz and Holmes Lybrand contributed to this report.

Source: www.cnn.com

Admin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All Rights Reserved By viral news magazine
Bảie leveluplimo