Schumer plans to burn a pit vote on Monday as Republicans continue to complain

The bill has been stuck since then Procedural voting failed on WednesdayRepublican Whip John Thune predicted that he would eventually pass a large number of GOP votes without receiving the changes Republicans were looking for.

And Senate leader Chuck Schumer said he would schedule another procedural vote to defeat. Republican Filibuster On Monday, I’m trying to force Republicans to let it through. As of Thursday afternoon, Schumaer had not officially scheduled a vote on Monday, but he can ask for a vote at any time.

“It’s very ridiculous and dishonest to suggest that it has anything to do with the BBB,” Toomy said, referring to Buildback Better, the original name for the Democratic package. “As you know who knew about BBB, a few weeks before I raised this issue all the time, I recorded it very clearly. Therefore, someone deliberately made facts or dishonesty. You need to be unaware of it. ”

Toomey said he hadn’t been offered an amendment vote by the Democratic leadership and proposed an amendment to Toomey with a threshold of 60 votes, but Toomey wanted to add changes to the bill, so Toomey did it. I challenged Schumaer’s allegation that he refused. I didn’t just vote for the amendment.

“I don’t know where they came up with this,” Schumaer said at a press conference. “We gave Toomey-he’s in the way-the ability to make 60-vote amendments just as the bill is a 60-vote bill. He said in a conversation with at least some others. No, no, no. If you don’t put it in the bill, the bill will be killed. “I’m not going to support it.” I support the offer. “

“The Democrats have a good understanding of what we’re trying to get and have denied the amendment,” Toon said. “And if a Democrat is willing to vote for him on the amendment, I think it will be achieved.”

“His claim is that what it does is free up a lot of room under the cap to allow Democrats to spend more money through the normal spending process,” Thune explains. Did. “Therefore, his claim is that this is the right policy and can be taken care of by veterinarians, but it should be done in a way that is consistent with the fiscal policy around here, or sound fiscal policy. “

South Dakota Republican Senator Mike Rounds knows that the amendment could fail, but has echoed many other Republicans asking for a vote.

“At least I’ll make a clear note that I told them that this doesn’t work in its current form,” Rounds added.