Last week, a new bearded Arito gave a lecture dedicated to protecting religious freedom, which was only published Thursday by Notre Dame Law School.
“Freedom of religion is being attacked in many places because it is dangerous for those who want to retain full power,” Arito said. “It also probably grows from something dark and deep in human DNA-a tendency to distrust and hate people who aren’t like us,” he added.
His speech, delivered a month after the end of his blockbuster term, not only ended the federal right to abortion by a majority of courts, but also ruled in two cases in favor of religious conservatives. I gave it.
Alito gave a keynote speech on the Notre Dame Law School’s Religious Freedom Initiative. Most of the speech was devoted to a broad discussion of how religious freedom has been challenged throughout history.
Arito did not discuss the breach of the abortion decision written last May, but only indirectly referred to the final version he mentioned as an opinion that “the name may not be spoken.”
He did so by expressing his disapproval of foreign leaders who criticized the opinion.
“I’m honored to have been writing this period, and I think it’s the only Supreme Court ruling in the history of the institution that has been criticized by foreign leaders,” said Arito. “It’s completely detailed about American law.” I’m making a comment. “
He said one of the critics was British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, who announced plans to resign in early July, a few days after his opinion was given.
“He paid the price,” Arito said with a laugh and applause. He also criticized in comments criticized by French President Emmanuel Macron and Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.
Returning to religious freedom, Arito said the challenge was “to convince people that religious freedom is worth defending if they don’t think it’s a good thing to protect.” Told.
He said such efforts could involve focusing on how religion promotes “domestic tranquility.”
“It provides a way for religiously diverse people to unite and prosper,” he said. “The American experience is a good indication of that.”
He also pointed out the enormous philanthropic work carried out by religious groups and religious people.
In 2021, when a court frozen a Catholic foster parent contract that Philadelphia refused to treat same-sex couples as foster parents because it believed that marriage should take place between men and women. Said that he violated the first amendment. Arito complained that the court’s opinion was not sufficiently advanced and that the government should have made it much harder to enforce laws that burden the religious beliefs of some individuals.
“The court issued a fragment of a decision that puts religious freedom in a confused and vulnerable state,” Arito wrote at the time.
But just in the end, the court ruled twice in favor of religious conservatives. In one case, he stood by a public high school football coach trying to pray at the 50-yard line after the match. In another example, Maine stated that religious schools could not be excluded from lesson support programs open to public and private schools.
Arito finished his lecture in Rome with reference to the Bible. “The advocates of religious freedom, who’go out wisely like a snake and harmlessly like a dove’, can be expected to find an open mind in their message,” he said.
Source: www.cnn.com
