If the purpose of the investigation was to create a series of indisputable facts-Trump knew or should have known, he lost the election and the allegations of fraud were ridiculous-this Hearings have begun to convincingly fill the gap, relying heavily on the previous testimony of former Justice Secretary Bill Barr, who used dull words to dismiss Trump’s lies.
I knew his inner circle. Trump’s campaign and his White House officials said he told the former president that he had lost the election and that it had not been stolen from him.
Trump turned into “apparently intoxicated” Giuliani
The Commission aired a clip of the testimony of Trump spokesman Jason Miller, who also explains Giuliani. As “definitely drunk” on election night.
The election night account, in which Trump declared the entire election a fraud stolen from him, is an important element of the Commission’s presentation.
Trump’s campaign manager was on the sidelines
Bill Steppin, who ran the Trump campaign, didn’t show up to meet in person Testimony after his wife gave birth on Monday morning. Instead, members of the committee played part of his previous private testimony record.
Stephen’s testimony was calm and direct, explaining how he tried to protect Trump from Giuliani’s ideas on election night, and how he was on the sidelines by Trump later because he didn’t buy the election lie.
Stephen said he told Trump to avoid speaking on election night and wait for votes to be counted in major states. Instead, Trump, on Giuliani’s advice, said he won the election, and the result was a fraud.
Stephen later said it was his feeling that what was happening was “neither honest nor expert” to quit the campaign after the election.
Barr pointed out in his testimony recording video that the commission aired on Monday. Trump made allegations of these scams “before the evidence could actually be seen.”
In fact, as Trump’s official statement shows, he was preparing to question the results for weeks or months.
Where is Stepien now?
Authorities tracked allegations of fraud
The Commission played a long video excerpt from the bar spoken in his personal testimony take. About being asked by Trump to look up fraudulent claims.
The bar video was alleged through unfounded allegations of fraud made by Giuliani and Trump weeks after the election day, along with live testimony from a former US lawyer in Georgia and a former Philadelphia city commissioner.
The conspiracy theory has proven to be completely zero, with a logical explanation of what actually happened.
- There was no evidence of fraud in Philadelphia. “”Absolute garbage“The bar said.
- There was no evidence that a big vote was cast in Detroit. According to Barr, Trump actually did better in 2020 than in 2016.
- Truck driver concerns that he delivered fraudulent ballots were investigated and rejected.
- Misunderstanding videos shared online from Georgia Not a suitcase Of fraudulent ballotsNot a normally used lock box.
- The Dominion Voting Machine was not fraudulent. Barr said the “ridiculous claims” were made in a sensational way to influence people. read more..
Telling the truth has led to a threat to officials and their families
“After the president tweeted me by name and called me in his way, the threat became much more specific and much more graphic. And not only the name, but also the name, age, of ours. Family members were also included in the address, a picture of our home. “
Bar worried that Trump was “separated from reality”
“I’m a little depressed.’Boy, if he really believes in something like this, he’s out of touch. If he really believes in something like this, he’s a reality. Separated from, “bar said in a snippet.
Trump’s post-election funding was questioned as a shakedown
According to California Democrat Zoe Lofgren, he was openly attacking the elections and his campaign knew he had lost, so he funded up to 25 fundraising emails daily. I collected it.
Most of the money went to Trump’s Save America PAC. On January 6, he spent millions of dollars on a rally near the White House and sent money to Trump’s political allies, including Mark Meadows, then White House Chief of Staff.
“The’big lie’was also a big rip-off,” Rofgren summed up.
warning
The most important part of the hearing so far comes from the recorded testimony-from Bar, Stepien, Miller.
It’s a one-sided case
The nature of the hearing was very one-sided, without being questioned by Trump supporters.
Republican leaders, with the exception of Illinois’s Chaney and Adam Kinzinger, refused to join the committee. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi then refused plans to put Trump supporters on the panel, such as Ohio’s Jim Jordan and Indiana’s Jim Banks, who voted against proof of the 2020 election results. did.
As a result, no one in these hearings defends Trump.
What’s coming
I have an idea.Here’s what I said last week’s prime time hearing would cover Chainy: At the rest of the inquiry:
- Trying to use Government to spread his lies. At the third hearing on Wednesday, we’ll show you how Trump plans fraudulently on behalf of the US Attorney General and the US Justice Department spreads his falsely stolen election claims.
- Pressure Pence to reject voters. At the fourth hearing on Thursday, “Trump’s efforts to pressure Vice President Mike Pence to reject the January 6 election vote count” will be explained.
- Put pressure on state legislators. The fifth hearing will provide “evidence that President Trump has fraudulently pressured state legislators and election authorities to change election results.”
- Incitement riots. At the last two hearings in June, “Trump summoned a violent mob and instructed him to illegally march to the US Capitol,” “stop violence and force supporters to leave the Capitol.” Could not take immediate action to instruct. “
Source: www.cnn.com
