At a Republican private lunch on Tuesday, Senator John Konin of Texas explained to members what might be included in the package. But the bigger test hasn’t come yet, as Cornin and his Republican companion, Thom Tillis, North Carolina, have to sell the deal to the rest of the meeting.
However, it is not yet clear if there is sufficient Republican support to include all these provisions, and working groups including Kyrsten Sinema in Arizona and Chris Murphy in Connecticut have not yet announced an agreement. Hmm.
“I think it’s too early to predict how many people will vote,” said Kentucky leader Mitch McConnell. “I don’t want to guess how many members will support it because I haven’t agreed yet. Step 1 is, as I said repeatedly, trying to make a deal. I hope it is.” Probably. “
Red flag problem
One area to test Republican support is the Danger Signals Act. Already, a handful of Republicans have expressed concern about including federal incentives to pass the Locomotive Acts of more states. This issue can be an obstacle to negotiations.
Senator Josh Hawley told CNN that there were due process concerns about the Red Flag Act and that he did not support the state to encourage it to go through its own version.
“I don’t support it at the national level and I can’t say I’m a big fan of them,” said a Missouri Republican. “I don’t think we should encourage it.”
Senator Ron Johnson of Wisconsin and Kevin Kramer of North Dakota also expressed concern over overtaking them.
Tyris said Tuesday afternoon that he was defending CNN’s efforts to find a midpoint in the Red Flag Act and was discussing with Republicans how to secure guardrails to ensure due process.
“The method we define has the potential to have a positive effect on some states that have red flag laws that are not subject to federal grants and have no legal process or backend reimbursement or recovery.” Said Tyris. “When you describe it that way, you’re telling people that you can actually get some of the 19 states that actually went too far … they actually qualify for federal funding. If you want to rethink it. “
“I think I saw it working in Florida. It’s working better than any other state. Conservative members, conservative sheriffs, etc. are working as they have been in practice since 2017. I saw him saying he was, “said Tyris.
More support for strengthening checks 18-21 years old who want to buy semi-automatic firearms
Recently, Republican and Democratic negotiators have been the best way to ensure that boys’ records are reviewed when people between the ages of 18 and 21 go shopping for guns like the AR-15. We are working to determine. This is a loophole that senators like Conin and Tyris can close without delving into the widespread expansion of background checks. However, the problem is complicated by the fact that when an individual turns 18, many states erase the boy’s record and in others the boy’s record is sealed. Only three states, Utah, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, now require juvenile court records to be considered in background checks, according to the Gifford Law Center, which advocates stronger gun control in the country. ..
However, making the boy’s records available has so far attracted little backlash from conservatives.
“I think it’s a potentially promising path, but let’s see what they come up with,” Hurley said of ensuring that the boy’s records were reviewed as part of a background check.
Tyris told CNN on Tuesday that the working group is still trying to find the best way to give the state an incentive to make the boy’s record part of the review, and an extra step is to buy a gun during age. Of 18 and 21 warned that it could lead to a waiting period for those trying.
“It will, of course, force a period of time-we call it a waiting period-or how long it actually takes to get that information,” he said.
Source: www.cnn.com
