It would be nearly impossible for Mitch McConnell to ban abortion nationwide

Democrats use the Supreme Court draft In the opinion that could overturn the Roe v. Wade case and rekindle voters, the general sentiment from Republicans like McConnell was to focus elsewhere.

Democrats have warned that capsizing eggs can threaten access to contraception in some states.Mississippi Republican Party Governor Tate Reeves I told CNN’s Jake Tapper During the weekend, it’s not his state’s focus.

Understand why Republicans don’t want to discuss an almost total ban on abortions that would come into effect in Mississippi in the event of a Roe v. Wade case.

Some states have almost complete abortion bans

Tapper pushed Reeves for the exception of victims of incest under the Mississippi Trigger Act.Here is the excerpt Unpleasant conversation:

Tapper: Why is it permissible to force girls who are victims of incest to take their children, or children, to their term?

Reeves: As you know, Jake, more than 92% of all abortions in the United States are selective surgery.

Looking at the number of people who are actually incest, it is less than 1%. And if you need to discuss that possibility in the future …

Tapper: This is your law.

REEVES: … an exception to the trigger method, we can certainly do that.

What else is possible?

But here, McConnell, the top Republican of the United States, said USA Today In an interview published on May 6th Yes, Senate Republicans can technically consider imposing a national abortion ban, even if the majority of Americans do not want it.

“If the leaked opinion becomes the final opinion, not only state-level but also federal-level legislative bodies could certainly be legislated in that area,” McConnell said.

“And if this was the final decision, it was that it should be resolved in some way during the legislative process. Yes, it is possible.”

Is a national ban really possible?

“Yes, that’s possible,” not exactly screaming from the rooftop that Republicans would push to enact a national ban. But that doesn’t rule out that idea, and it goes against the “let the state decide” mantra adopted by other Republicans.

When asked about McConnell’s comments on Monday, White House spokesman Jen Psaki said there was a “serious risk” of a state ban. “Mitch McConnell and other Republicans in Congress are talking about a national ban on women’s choices,” she said.

Interestingly, McConnell knows it better than anyone else, as it feels almost impossible to enact a national abortion ban.

Filibuster interferes with Republicans and Democrats in abortion

Elsewhere in the interview, McConnell completely denied the idea that Republicans would end the filibuster to ban abortion-a habit of allowing a minority in the Senate to block most laws. -. He reiterated his vow on Monday in a statement from the Senate floor that he would never support breaking the legislative filibuster on this and other issues.

If McConnell sticks to it, drawing that line would mean that Republicans may never have a vote banning abortion at the federal level.

Many Democrats Willing to end the filibuster To protect women’s rights, women lack the 50 votes needed to do so.

Even if the Republicans won the House and Senate in November and changed the rules banning abortion next year, they would see Joe Biden as president for another two years. He did not sign a national abortion ban.

About show voting

Just because something doesn’t go to law right away doesn’t mean it’s focused and not voted on.

Republicans voted over and over again for a proposal to abolish the Affordable Care Act a few years ago, even after it became clear that it would fail.

Democrats will do the same this week when trying to record all Republicans against making them a permanent right for American women to have an abortion.

That plan The Senate Democrats voted on a bill known as the Women’s Health Protection Act that systematizes the right to abortion. It may be an important political moment, but it’s not concrete.

It brings us to something else McConnell told USA Today.

“I think it’s pretty clear where Senate Republicans stand on the issue of abortion,” McConnell said.

About Collins and Murkowski

It’s actually pretty confusing that Senator Susan Collins, a Republican of abortion, is standing on the issue of abortion, so I’ll suspend him here.

She has long supported the right to abortion, suggesting that she felt confused by judges Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh, who voted to confirm with the Republican-appointed Supreme Court.

but!Collins too She signaled that she would vote against the Democratic bill Enact the principles behind the Roe v. Wade case. She says democracy’s proposals are too broad and wants a so-called conscience clause that allows providers to refuse to have an abortion for religious or moral reasons.

Collins has a unique proposal with Alaska’s Senator Lisa Murkowski to codify an egg, called the reproductive selection method. Democrats say Collins’ proposal is too weak. Read it here.

It’s called having it in both ways: Collins is for codifying the Roe v. Wade case (her own proposal), but still votes against codifying it. (Democratic Party proposal).

Why is the Democratic Party not seeking bipartisanism?

I have a question for Democrats here as well. The proposals they are seeking to vote for are similar to the proposals that failed in February.

It should be possible for Democrats to vote for something simpler than McConnell. They may win those few Republican votes, or at least try to win them.

A bipartisan vote in favor of protecting the right to abortion can send the message that it is a minority of members of the country that is in the way of something most Americans support. Instead, Democrats are choosing to vote on bills that may not even get all Democratic votes. West Virginia Senator Joe Manchin Again Opposes..

Protesting Nationally in Support of Abortion Rights-In Maine, Collins’ Hometown, and More Republican-appointed Supreme Court Judge’s House -If a draft opinion is passed that overturns the Roe v. Wade case and allows the state to ban abortion, it suggests that the issue could motivate more Democrats than Republicans.

But if either side expects a swift move at Capitol Hill where the minority can stop the law, that side will be disappointed.

Source: www.cnn.com