Spy Court Fast Facts | CNN



CNN

Here’s some background information about Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court was created in 1978.

It exists to oversee and approve activities carried out under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (FISA).

In front of the patriot act (2001), a foreign intelligence service should have been the primary object of the investigation. Now, foreign intelligence must be an important objective.

The court will be held in a high security room on the sixth floor of the Justice Department.

All court proceedings are confidential.

The Court has two parts, the Lower Court and the Trial Court.

of The lower courts have a rotating panel of 11 federal district court judges.At least three of the judges must live within 20 miles of the District of Columbia.

of The review court consists of three judges.

From October 25, 1978 President Jimmy Carter Sign Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Law enactedestablish a court.

From October 26, 2001 President George W. Bush Sign the USA PATRIOT ACT AFTER US ATTACK. September 11th.

From May 17, 2002 The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court has denied the Justice Department’s request to allow intelligence agencies and criminal prosecutors to cooperate more freely in cases. It’s the first time in its 24-year history that a court has denied a request from the Justice Department, according to The New York Times. On August 22, the Department of Justice appealed the ruling.

From May 17, 2002 The court has identified 75 cases in which the FBI and DOJ submitted false information to gain approval for surveillance.All occurred during administration Bill Clinton.

From September 9, 2002 The Review Court will be held for the first time in its history. Judge hears from Attorney General Theodore Olson allegations that the Patriot Act of 2001 expands the reach of his FISA and allows for greater cooperation between intelligence and law enforcement agencies . No other opinions will be heard, as per court rules.

From September 10, 2002 The Senate Judiciary Committee asks the retrial court to release all records of the Sept. 9 hearing and the court’s decision. “We need to know how this law (the Patriot Act) is being interpreted and applied,” said Senator Patrick Leahy, chairman of the Judiciary Committee.

From November 2, 2002 A review court overturned a key court decision limiting the government’s use of wiretaps to target suspected spies and terrorists.

From December 15, 2005 The New York Times reports that Bush signed an executive order in 2002 to allow the National Security Agency (NSA) to make calls to Americans and others in the United States without obtaining a warrant through the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (international phone calls). in) reportedly allowed wiretapping. According to the paper, 500 of her were being monitored at one time in the United States, and abroad he was tapped by 5,000 to 7,000 people.

From December 16, 2005 In his weekly live radio address, President Bush admitted to authorizing the warrantless wiretapping, but defended his actions as “fully consistent with my constitutional responsibilities and powers.”

From December 19, 2005 At a press conference, Bush defended the warrantless wiretapping, stating: US congressional leaders have been briefed on the program more than a dozen times. And it has been effective in confounding our enemies while protecting our civil liberties. Since the September 11th attacks, I have reauthorized this program more than 30 times, and will continue to do so as long as the country faces the ongoing threat of enemies to kill American citizens. ”

From December 19, 2005 Lower Court Judge James Robertson resigns in a letter addressed to Chief Justice John RobertsAccording to The Washington Post, the resignation is in protest of Bush’s actions regarding warrantless wiretapping.

From August 17, 2006 Judge Anna Diggs Taylor of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan has disabled the NSA’s warrantless wiretapping program, accusing it of violating free speech and privacy rights.

From January 17, 2007 The Bush administration has announced that it will allow courts to oversee surveillance programs in the country and will seek court approval before tapping. This overturns a position held by the administration since the covert wiretapping program was revealed in 2005.

From August 5, 2007 President Bush signed into law the American Protection Act of 2007, which updates the Foreign Surveillance Act of 1978, but is only valid for six months. The new law gives the Attorney General or Director of National Intelligence the power to bypass the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to authorize surveillance of suspected terrorists abroad.

From June 5, 2013 British newspaper The Guardian Top Secret FISA Court Order Verizon must turn over millions of customer phone records to the National Security Agency. The order, which was requested by her FBI, would give the NSA comprehensive access to the phone records of millions of Americans, according to reports.

From January 17, 2014 President Barack Obama Requires Congress to authorize the establishment of a new commission of outside advocates to participate in “significant cases” before the secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, which handles intelligence-gathering matters.

From June 2, 2015 Obama signs the American Freedom Act, which includes: Many FISA Court ReformsFISA court decisions are declassified in accordance with law and an expert panel is established to advise the court on civil liberties, technology and other matters. Under the new rules, research agencies must obtain FISA court approval to access metadata from telecommunications companies. The US Freedom Act allows the NSA to collect phone records during her limited six-month transition period.

From April 12, 2017 The Washington Post reports that the FBI and DOJ obtained a warrant Watch from FISA Court Judges President Donald Trump’s Former campaign adviser Carter Page as part of an investigation into possible ties between the Trump campaign and the Trump campaign. Russia.

From September 18, 2017 CNN reports that US investigators wiretapped former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort. Under secret court orders before and after the election. The surveillance began in 2014 after the FBI began investigating a Washington consulting firm working for Ukraine’s former ruling party, and was halted in 2016 due to lack of evidence. A new FISA court warrant was obtained after it began investigating its ties to operatives.

From March 28, 2018 Department of Justice Internal Observer Announces The agency said it has launched an investigation into the FBI’s handling of warrant applications under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.

From July 21, 2018 FBI releases redacted versions of previously classified foreign surveillance warrant applications. Trump campaign foreign policy adviser Carter Page.

From August 19, 2020 Former FBI Attorney Kevin Kleinsmith Formally Pleads Guilty of Altering Email Text While working to update the page’s surveillance application in 2017. He admitted one charge of tampering with an email to another official in 2017. with suspended sentence.

From April 19, 2021 The ACLU and other groups asked the Supreme Court whether special courts reviewing government requests for electronic surveillance for foreign intelligence purposes need to disclose material comments received after 9/11. I am asking you to consider.filing mark It is the first time the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court has been asked by the Supreme Court to decide whether its confidential opinions must be made public. – What to edit. Supreme Court, Nov. refuse to consider the request.

From January 31, 2022 In the report, the NSA inspector general NSA found it did not follow both court-approved and internal procedures This is intended to prevent officials from using the Foreign Information Services Act to improperly monitor communications of Americans.

From May 24, 2022 FBI agent reveals in testimony The FBI is conducting an internal investigation into possible wrongdoing This includes the potential for improper handling of surveillance warrants and the potential forholding of materials from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.

Source: www.cnn.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.