The Democrats’ Dangerous Bet – CNNPolitics

Their efforts, which have been repeated in multiple primaries so far this year, will face a final test Tuesday night in Michigan.

Tuesday’s test case involved Michigan Rep. Peter Meyer, who voted for Democrats and against most of his party to impeach Trump. Meijer also voted to support the creation of a bipartisan independent commission to investigate the Jan. 6, 2021 attacks on the Capitol, which his party blocked. Read CNN’s report on Meijer.

Full primary coverage:

Help Meyer’s Opponent

Meijer’s brave profile earned him the animosity of Trump supporters and the first challenge from John Gibbs, a former Trump administration official and 2020 election denier.

Note: Three of the 10 House Republicans who voted to impeach Trump face a tough primary on Tuesday.Click here for details CNN’s report on the impeachment of a Washington Republican.

It is Gibbs who has the tacit help of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. The DCCC is the organization tasked with the difficult task of maintaining control of the Democratic House of Representatives.

Instead of buying ads for Democrats across the country, the group poured more than $300,000 into ads focused on Gibbs’ relationship with Trump. The ad seems designed to help Gibbs along with Trump voters, rather than hurt him.

Gambling in November

The gamble, of course, is that these right-wing candidates could win elections this year, when the Democrats are less active and the Republicans are looking to win the House.

If we’ve learned anything from Trump’s volatile political career, which shocked even himself with his 2016 Electoral College victory, it’s that if two people turn out to vote in November, whoever wins It means you can.

Where else are Democrats supporting far-right Republicans?

This is a recipe that is repeated not only at Meyer’s race, but at many races around the country.

Transparency Organization Open Secrets documented expenditure In other Republican races — almost $44 million was spent by Democratic political groups and nonprofits, much of it for the very expensive Illinois gubernatorial race.

With varying degrees of success, it has helped in the California House elections. Gubernatorial elections in Illinois, Pennsylvania, Colorado and Maryland. Colorado race for the US Senate.

How is help displayed?

Looks like a TV ad — The Washington Post put them together — Far-right candidates may say they’re too conservative, but they combine their message with bright music, bright colors, and imagery. Candidate with Trump. The ad basically promotes the candidate’s support for Trump and can encourage Trump supporters to participate in the Republican primary.

In Illinois and Colorado, Democratic Party money was used to attack moderates in the Republican primary, rather than to provoke far-right candidates.

The Democratic-backed Republican candidate lost in Colorado but won in Illinois and Maryland.

Has this been done before?

yes. Former Senate Majority Leader Harry Reed, who died last year, blazed a trail in 2010, but he was wildly unpopular in his home state of Nevada.his supporter Contributed to engineer Sharon Angle’s first victory. She was seen as a Republican that Reid could beat. He did, but barely.
Democrats did it again in 2012 when they helped push Todd Aiken up in Missouri. Then Sen. Claire McCaskill said that Aiken was widely criticized for “legitimate rapeThis is a gaffe worth reconsidering as states like Missouri move to ban abortion.
MacAskill frankly wrote in memoirs About how Akin spent $1.7 million to win the primary, and how “awful” she would have felt if he had been a senator.

“On the other hand, moving down the list of issues, there was not a ten-cent value difference between the three leading candidates on how they would have voted if they were senators,” McCa said. “In the long run, antagonizing Todd Aiken has made it more likely that Missourians will no longer be represented by someone with extreme views,” Skill argued.

Republicans have also tried to intervene in the primaries. Remember “operation chaosWhere were Republicans encouraged to vote for Senator Bernie Sanders in the 2020 South Carolina Democratic primary? It led me on the way to the house.

Missing from all these examples is the underlying theme of electoral denialism, which Democrats say they are fighting, and which has shaken the very notion of democracy in the United States.

everything is fair

Democrats claim they must stay in power to protect democracy. Meijer endorsed House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy with 90% of the vote. According to ProPublica.

It’s also true that if Republicans win a majority in the House with Meyer’s help in the November midterm elections, the House’s further investigation on Jan. 6 will be over.

The goal is to control the house

Meijer singled out Rep. Elaine Luria of Virginia when she complained that Democrats on the House Jan. 6 committee should be kept out of the primary. Luria has worked with Meyer on foreign policy matters, but she said it’s not her job to decide what the DCCC does in the primary.

“Their goal is to win a majority in the House, and each precinct has a calculation for how they think is the most effective way to do that.” Luria told a Jewish insider.
The DCCC is “focused on maintaining a majority in the House” and will do “what it takes to keep the speaker’s gavel out of McCarthy’s hands,” said DCCC spokeswoman Helen Kalla. . Quoted by CNN’s Dan Merica.

“Spare me…”

Merica has also spoken with a number of Democrats who have been openly critical of the strategy.

And Meyer, a Republican, was quoted as saying that Democrats, who allege obvious hypocrisy and claim to defend democracy, are “shameless” in supporting candidates who refuse to vote.

“Spare that bullshit,” Meyer said, according to Merika. I’m just there.”

If the Democrats manage to retain control of the House by a vote or two, these pragmatic political efforts will be hailed as wise politics. If they don’t, the Democrats will be responsible for getting more people who will oppose the election into office.

Election Skepticism Becomes Hyperlocal

CNN’s Fredreka Schouten wrote: How electoral vetoism permeates For elections of any kind. She examines New Mexico’s efforts to contest her June 7 primary and how election skeptics are seeking key posts in counties and states.

Key line: And as proponents of election skepticism push their theories into the more obscure corners of American democracy, state election officials are now scrambling to meet new challenges. It warns that the pervasiveness of these isolated pockets of resistance to the performance of usual ceremonial electoral functions, such as the authentication of , could lead to disruption in future elections.

“This destabilization is in the weeds,” said Colorado Secretary of State Jenna Griswold. “This is one of many signs that democracy is in code red.”

Source: www.cnn.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Bảie leveluplimo