Opinion: It’s time for Dianne Feinstein to leave

This is the Rebecca Trailer Tour deforce article About Feinstein on the cover of this week’s New York Magazine.

Tracer details the history of women who were once at the forefront of progress-early supporters of gay rights who pushed her path into the Hall of Fame for almost every man-but its political urges. Is now heading towards the center.

Senior Senator California believes in bipartisanism, politeness, and working throughout the aisle. But she Senate And other important American institutions No longer working A bipartisan politician on one side of the aisle has decided to destroy our government inside out.

“Her dedication is directed to systems where legislation is enacted, regulations are enforced, and surveillance is important,” Tracer writes.

Feinstein’s cognitive ability is also targeted Many speculationsAnd her conversation with the trailer does not instill confidence.

She has a decades of career and is the oldest US Senator in just a few weeks after her 89th birthday. (Republican Senator Charles Ernest Grassley in Iowa is only a few months young.)

Still, her seniority has benefited her state of California, but it has benefited so broadly to countries that have taken a dangerously divisive path and are in desperate need of fresh and visionary leadership. not.

The decision about who stays in the Senate and who should go to the Senate should not be made strictly by age, but age is certainly one factor.

After voting at Capitol Hill in Washington, DC on January 31, 2019, Senator Dianne Feinstein of California is waiting to take the elevator.

In addition to Glasley (88), this includes at least-Oklahoma Republican Senator Jim Inhofe (87). Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont and Republican minority leader Mitch McConnell are both 80 years old, probably old enough for their respective parties, and will not go anywhere soon.

Fortunately, other Chamber of Commerce octets, Senator Richard Shelby, 88, of Alabama and Patrick Leahy, 82, of Vermont, haven’t asked for reelection this year.

But finally resigning after the age of 80 does not mean generously handing over the baton to a new generation. Does the senator in question understand how endangered our country is? It does not mean that the old man should not serve. Only the number of seats in parliament is limited, and in representative democracy, representative democracy must represent the country, at least to some extent, including age. You don’t need a Senate that is significantly older than the country. We need a member who understands the urgency of the moment we are.

Unfortunately, Feinstein is not.

She sits in the Senate, almost helpless by the abuse of filibuster, and she is aware of the problem but does not insist on abolishing it. Her Republican colleagues have proven to be more radical and uncompromising than ever, trying to undermine the very system that Feinstein cherishes. Nevertheless, she continues to seek compromises with them, from voting to choice, even at the expense of very basic principles and freedoms.

Her Republican Senate colleague, for example, refused to allow former President Barack Obama to appoint a judge in the U.S. Supreme Court in the election year, opening the door for former President Donald Trump to appoint. Open. Roev. Wade, a judge who is currently in a position to overturn the vote, or at least hit the internal organs.

yet Feinstein applauds So far, Judge Amy Coney Barrett of the Supreme Court has called these confirmation hearings “one of the best hearings I have attended.” And, as an appropriate measure, she told Lindsey Graham, South Carolina, the Commission’s Republican Chairman. Whole body hug At the end of those hearings.
Asking Feinstein to resign does not mean that she was a bad senator. she is, Torture report It sheds light on one of the darkest times in modern American history in her work on gun control.

She broke the barrier of being elected as a female politician, and as a first-generation member of the female senator, on her own and in more than one-off numbers. She is reportedly a strict boss, with a harsh personality that many have historically felt praiseworthy for men and unbearable for women.

In other words, her history was presumable, As various failures and failures Over the years, her heritage has been quite mixed. In this respect, she is not much different from many renowned men in the Senate. And her political future should be evaluated in the same language.
There is an urge among feminists, including this, to push back many calls for women in power to give up when they reach a certain age. These demands often seem disproportionate to the woman in question, whether Feinstein or a former Supreme Court judge. Ruth Bader Ginsburg Or the Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi..

Women seeking and retaining political power are a relatively new phenomenon, often causing tremendous anger among those who admire women’s progress on the surface, but when they do not act exactly as they wish. Rub.

There may be sexist motives behind some of these demands, but that does not mean that all of them are illegal. Feinstein is not the only senator to plan for retirement.

But she is a particularly strong member of parliament. And she belongs to the Democratic Party, which isn’t just hungry for change-her survival depends on it.

Source: www.cnn.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Bảie leveluplimo